مجلة العلوم القانونية والاجتماعية
Volume 7, Numéro 1, Pages 1262-1283
2022-03-01
الكاتب : سرباح أحمد .
In this article, we have addressed the issue of the implementation of sentences issued by administrative justice, and the problems associated with it. Administrative judicial authorities, like other judicial authorities, pronounce judgments on disputes relating to their examination in accordance with the law; with the aim of embodying what was settled by the conviction of the administrative judge as a solution to the conflict raised. As soon as these judgments are being carried out, whether for or against the public administration. The execution of verdicts in favor of the public administration against private opponents does not pose a problem, unlike the judgments handed down against it, which poses many problems; given that its judgments contained a financial penance including other obligations, or in particular given the privileges enjoyed by the administration vis-à-vis opponents, in addition to the ambiguity of the legal texts related to the execution of verdicts against the public administration. This brings into play the realization of the principle of the sovereignty of the law. We have tried to highlight the different peculiarities related to the implementation of judgments of the administrative judicial power: on the one hand to confront the administration, and on the other hand the different legal procedures for this implementation.
Administrative judiciary ; Public Administration ; execution of judgements ; implementation procedures
بوسالم أحلام
.
عابد يوسف
.
ص 117-132.
Yahia Zeghoudi
.
pages 74-88.
البسايطة ابراهيم عايد ابراهيم
.
بن عائشة نبيلة
.
ص 510-527.
بالجيلالي خالد
.
بالجيلالي خالد
.
ص 174-189.