قراءات
Volume 4, Numéro 4, Pages 33-63
2014-06-30
Authors : Ibrahim Abushihab .
The paper proposes a descriptive contrastive study of the passive form in Jordanian Urban Arabic and Modern Standard Turkish. The discussion leads to different major conclusions. Both Modern Standard Turkish and Jordanian Urban Arabic have active and passive constructions. We can form passive in both languages from transitive and intransitive verbs as well. Jordanian Urban Arabic and Modern Standard Turkish also allow passivisation from ditransitive verbs. But unlike Modern Standard Turkish, Jordanian Urban Arabic active voice is much more frequently used because the passive voice in Jordanian Urban Arabic is only used when the subject (agent) of the active sentence is not known or kept unknown on purpose whereas the agent of a passive sentence may be stated in Modern Standard Turkish.
Contrastive analysis ,Modern standard Turkish ,Passivisation. Turkish vowel harmony, Syntax and Arabic Passive form.
Ouahmiche Ghania
.
pages 21-28.
Samir Fekry Christina
.
pages 143-161.
Azizi Afaf
.
Belarbi Ahmed Noureddine
.
M.onur Hasdedoğlu
.
pages 890-907.
Bourouina El-hadj
.
pages 511-522.
Hami Nadjia
.
Abdelfettah Ahcène
.
pages 120-131.