مجلة الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية
Volume 9, Numéro 2, Pages 1-30

البنية الحجاجية للمناظرات الكلامية ــ مُنَاظَرَةُ الجُبَّائِي لِأَبِي الحَسَنِ الأَشْعَرِي ــ

الكاتب : زحاف بسمة . المكي العلمي .

الملخص

This research based on the premise that considers the verbal debate as a communicational act, social fact and a linguistic argumentative interactional action. It can be done within single or different civilizational patterns, which stars by the emitter who sends sings to the receptor to make the pragmatic interaction and the intellectual and emotional exchange. Both parties use some speech types, linguistictools and argumentative techniques; they exchange arguments and adopt the adversarial system for convincing, persuasion and discontinuing.Thus, the debate is an intentional and managed speech, aimingto make impact on the receptor and to push him to admit the correctness of the second debater’s point of view and change his own. Both debater’s needs argumentative action in order to achieve their aim. And that what we are going to do by following a procedural approach on the debate of « Abi Ali Eldjoubai» and« Abi El Hassan El Achaâri »…

الكلمات المفتاحية

pragmatism,argumentation, debate,Abo Ali Eldjoubai, Abo El Hassan El Achaâri.